|
Many
people believe that breath testing is an accurate method of
determining the amount of alcohol in a person's blood. In fact,
breath testing is far from accurate and as currently used is
fraught with error which can lead to false high readings that
are significantly higher than a person's true blood alcohol
content at the time of the test or at the time of operation
based upon a number of variables not taken into account by the
machine.
|
Breath
to Blood Partition Ratios
|
Breath testing is based upon the principal that there is a
direct relationship between the amount of alcohol in a person's
expired air sample and the amount of alcohol in the person's
blood. All breath testing equipment currently used in the United
States assumes this ratio to be 2100 to 1. In other words; the
amount of alcohol in one milliter of our blood when consuming
alcohol is 2100 times greater than the amount of alcohol found
in 1 cubic centimeter of our expired air sample. According to
the theory, if one took 2100 cubic centimeters of our deep lung
air and analyzed the amount of alcohol in that sample, the
amount of alcohol in that sample would be equal to the amount of
alcohol in one milliliter of our blood.
Consequently, the machines are calibrated on the assumption that
everyone has a 2100 to 1 ratio. However, not everyone has a 2100
breath to blood ratio. In fact, recent research shows this ratio
to vary from 990 to 1 to 3005 to 1. If a person has a ratio
lower than 2100 to 1 then the corresponding breath test result
will be artificially high. On the other hand, if a persons ratio
is higher than 2100 to 1, then a persons breath test sample will
be artificially low. For example, if a person took a breath test
and produced a .10 and had a breath to blood partition ratio of
1000 to 1, the persons true blood alcohol content would be .05.
Because the machine does not have the capability to determine
what a person's actual ratio is, it has no way of detecting the
error it has made. Moreover, a person's breath to blood
partition ratio varies from person to person and even varies
within the person over time, making it almost impossible to
classify the breath tests results as accurate.
In the absorptive phase, the average mean for a healthy white
male is 1776 to 1. Through the use of statistical analysis this
translates into 75% of the people submitting to the test being
overestimated and 25% being underestimated based upon this
factor alone. The absorptive phase can last up to 5 hours after
a persons last drink on a full stomach and 2 on an empty
stomach.
On the other hand, if a person is in the post absorptive phase,
25% will be overestimated and 75% will be underestimated based
upon this factor alone. Current breath testing equipment assumes
that a person is in the post-absorptive phase when in fact many
people arrested for DWI are in the absorptive phase. Even the
leading proponents of breath testing concede that it is
virtually impossible to determine at which stage a person is in
at the time of the test and therefore impossible to determine
whether or not the person is overestimated or underestimated.
A person's breathing technique (the way a person blows into a
breath testing machine) will effect the accuracy of the reading
produced on the machine. To produce a .10 on a Intoxilyzer 5000,
the machine actually detects less than 1 millionth of a fluid
ounce of alcohol in the breath sample. This amount is smaller
than a pin head. If a person blows into the machine for a long
period over 10 seconds, the resulting reading can be higher than
the person's actual true blood alcohol content by to 150%. In a
recent lecture at Harvard University, Dr. Michael Hlastala of
the University of Washington Department of Medicine confirmed
that breathing technique can significantly impact on a person's
true BAC.
If a person holds their breath, or is a shallow breather, that
can cause the reading to be over 20% higher than the true BAC.
Given that the breathing pattern is not controlled, it is
impossible to determine whether or not a person's result on the
breath test is articifically high and to what degree.
Many of today's breath testing equipment rely on infrared
analysis to determine how much alcohol is in a person's expired
breath sample. A major flaw in the analysis is that many of
these instruments are non-specific for alcohol. That is, they
are not designed to detect the molecule of ethyl alcohol, but
rather only a part of that molecule - the methyl group. These
machines are based on the Baer-Lambert theory which states that
all organic substances absorb infrared energy at different wave
lengths. Alcohol absorbs at over 8 wave lengths however, the
great majority of the Intoxilyzer 5000's currently being
employed only test at two wave lengths 3.39 and 3.48 microns.
This creates a potential problem because there are several other
compounds or substances that absorb at these wave lengths that
may be present in a person's air sample. When these other
substances are present, the machines read them as being alcohol
molecules when in fact they are not. This can lead to a
situation where a person is charged with DWI based upon a breath
test when in fact he has no alcohol at all in his blood. One
study conducted recently revealed a case where a cabinet maker
produced a reading of .24 when a simultaneous blood test showed
that he had no alcohol in his blood. The reading was obviously
attributable to the cabinet maker's inhalation of chemicals
contained in the paint he was applying which have a similar
chemical structure of alcohol.
If a person belches, or has false teeth, this can also produce
false high readings.
The temperature of the person's breath sample is also of
importance. If the temperature of a person's breath sample is 1
degree above 34 C, then the person's reading will be about 7%
higher than the person's true BAC. Temperature is an important
variable that should be measured and controlled when evaluating
the accuracy of any breath test however, to date no machine has
been designed to make sure the subject's breath sample is of the
proper temperature.
|